7.1: Gender as a Cultural Lens, part 2

How Ideas of Gender Shape Culture
Read by Thu Feb 18,
Reading Response due Wed Feb 24,
Queer: A Graphic History, by Meg-John Barker, illustrated by Julia Scheele
From Queer: A Graphic History, by Meg-John Barker, illustrated by Julia Scheele

Why?

Gender theory is not just about identifying problems, but seeking action and answers. So, how do these theories act in the real world? How do you apply notions of gender theory or feminism to cultural fields? How does gender theory manifest itself? The readings below illustrate answers to some of these questions. They also introduce queer theory, which uses early gender theory and feminism as a springboard into further questioning sex and gender.

Aside from the overt attention to sex and gender, queer theory posits some interesting ideas about looking beyond binaries. We often look at our world as one of absolutes. What if we approached more things not as polarities, but as spectrums? As always, it is up to you to discern the eternal from the temporal and cultural.

Required

Queer Theory, Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists? (excerpt)

Supplementary Readings

Queer Theory and Queer Formalism
Notes on Queer Formalism, Big Red & Shiny
“Queer formalism is a paradox. Formalism requires the centrality of an object, whereas queer rejects authorship and universal concepts. Queer subverts singularity while the medium requires it. To find meaning in the internal factors of the medium is to invest in its selfhood, its ability to signify. But isn’t this what queer accomplishes? Is this not what we have fought for—the ability to express one’s self, to speak, to be legible to others as a unified agent? Queer rejects unification, however. It advocates for a ‘queer subject’ while attacking the notion of ‘subjecthood.’ Where is the balance?”
Taxi Ride to Gauguin: An Interview with Amy Sillman & Nicole Eisenman, Haunt
“One of the tenets of queer formalism, as I see it, is a complex interchange between identities and mediums, personal histories and aesthetic histories. There is an ongoing process of owning or disowning one’s chosen medium, just as one must wrestle constantly with one’s competing gendered, artistic, racial, and sexual, selves. When looking at your work, Nicole and Amy, I see a series of continuities and changes, such as Nicole’s move from ink to painting, and now sculpture, and Amy’s interest in digital techno logies. No matter the medium, however, your investment in it remains fiercely rigorous and investigative. How has your changing engagement with various materials mirrored an evolution in your personal and artistic identities?”
Judith Butler on the Culture Wars, JK Rowling and Living in “Anti-intellectual Times”, New Statesman
“In the three decades since Gender Trouble was published, the world has changed beyond recognition. In 2014, TIME declared a ‘Transgender Tipping Point.’ Butler herself has moved on from that earlier work, writing widely on culture and politics. But disagreements over biological essentialism remain, as evidenced by the tensions over trans rights within the feminist movement. How does Butler, who is Maxine Elliot Professor of Comparative Literature at Berkeley, see this debate today? And does she see a way to break the impasse? Butler recently exchanged emails with the New Statesman about this issue. The exchange has been edited.”
Feminism in Design
Art of Feminism: Images that Shaped the Fight for Equality, 1857–2017
“From highlighting the posters of the Suffrage Atelier, through the radical art of Judy Chicago and Carrie Mae Weems, to the cutting-edge work of Sethembile Msezane and Andrea Bowers, The Art of Feminism traces the way feminists have shaped visual arts and media throughout history. Featuring more than 350 works of art, illustration, photography, performance, and graphic design-along with essays examining the legacy of the radical canon-this rich volume showcases the vibrancy of the feminist aesthetic over the last 150 years.”
Women Design: Pioneers in Architecture, Industrial, Graphic and Digital Design from the Twentieth Century to the Present Day
“From architects and product designers to textile artists and digital innovators, Women Design profiles a selection of the most dynamic female designers from the modern era, showcasing their finest work and celebrating their enduring influence. Design throughout history has been profoundly shaped and enhanced by the creativity of women; as practitioners, commentators, educators and commissioners. But in a narrative that eagerly promotes their male counterparts, their contributions are all too often overlooked. Through 21 engaging profiles, Women Design rediscovers and revels in the work of pioneers such as Eileen Gray, Lora Lamm and Lella Vignelli, while shining a spotlight on modern-day trailblazers including Kazuyo Sejima, Hella Jongerius and Neri Oxman. Richly illustrated with archival imagery, this is a rare glimpse into the working worlds of some of the most influential forces in contemporary design.”
Women Who Draw
“Women Who Draw is an open directory of female* professional illustrators, artists and cartoonists. It was created by two women artists in an effort to increase the visibility of female illustrators, emphasizing female illustrators of color, LBTQ+, and other minority groups of female illustrators. *Women Who Draw is trans-inclusive and includes women, trans and gender non-conforming illustrators.”
The Role of Women in Design | 12 Designers – 12 Opinions, Graphicart News
“What role are women designers playing in today’s world? Are they taking a more leading role in the design field? Do women and their male counterparts differ in anyway? From a feminist aspect, women and men do not differ in any kind. However, the numbers speak the truth, as we do not find enough women designers in conferences, publications, or as jurors. Is this a reversing trend? Barbara Szaniecki from Brazil, Belen Mena from Ecuador, Benito Cabanas from Mexico, Chris Lozos from United States, Gitte Kath from Denmark, Jamila Varawala from India, Lygia Santiago from Brazil, Maria Mercedes Salgado from Ecuador, Marina Córdova Alvéstegui and Susana Machicao both from Bolivia, respectable designers , well known to our community and Veerle Poupeye from Jamaica, Executive Director of the National Gallery of Jamaica, were called to give the role of women in design as they experiences it in their respective countries or just global observations. They came with very interesting points and links for your references.”
Rebecca Wright on the Ratio of Girls with Design Degrees vs. Those in the Industry, It's Nice That
“We often find ourselves discussing the role, and lack of women in the world of graphic design. Rather than try and cackhandedly work it out for ourselves we decided to ask someone at the frontline of the issue to help explain it. Rebecca Wright is programme director of graphic communication design at Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London.”
How One Design Agency is Fighting for Feminism, Creative Bloq
“Liam Fay-Fright explains why Mother London joined forces with fashion mag Elle to fight the patriarchy, in the design industry and beyond.”
Haus Proud: The Women of Bauhaus, The Guardian
“More women than men applied to the school in 1919, and Gropius insisted that there would be ‘no difference between the beautiful and the strong sex’—those very words betraying his real views. Those of the 'strong sex’ were, in fact, marked out for painting, carving and, from 1927, the school’s new architecture department. The 'beautiful sex’ had to be content, mostly, with weaving.”
Invisible Women, 99% Invisible

“Even when women are the focus of design, their actual needs are still sometimes ignored. Consider the three-stone stove, a traditional cooking mechanism used by 80% of people in the developing world. It is a simple device consisting of three stones with a fire underneath and a pot above. This stove not terribly efficient and is often placed in poorly ventilated rooms, exposing women in particular to the equivalent of multiple packs of cigarettes per day worth of harmful smoke. Alternatives have been developed by well-meaning groups, but adoption has been slow, in part because many designers have simply failed to consult the actual women for whom they are designing.”

Invisible Women

“Welcome to the Gender Data Gap. Our world is largely built for and by men, in a system that can ignore half the population. This book will tell you how and why this matters In her new book, Invisible Women, award-winning campaigner and writer Caroline Criado Perez shows us how, in a world largely built for and by men, we are systematically ignoring half the population. She exposes the gender data gap - a gap in our knowledge that is at the root of perpetual, systemic discrimination against women, and that has created a pervasive but invisible bias with a profound effect on women's lives. Caroline brings together for the first time an impressive range of case studies, stories and new research from across the world that illustrate the hidden ways in which women are excluded from the very building blocks of the world we live in, and the impact this has on their health and wellbeing. From government policy and medical research, to technology, workplaces, urban planning and the media - Invisible Women exposes the biased data that excludes women. In making the case for change, this powerful and provocative book will make you see the world anew.”

What Does a Feminist Graphic Design History in the United States Look Like?, Alphabettes

“It is my hope that this digital collection can be considered a humble contribution to the ongoing feminist effort in design. There are multiple limits in this collection. There is a disturbing lack of literature on women’s impact in the history of graphic design, independently of their background.”

This is part one of a four-part series.

Response Questions

  • How might you see gender playing a part in your professional field? How might it impact what you depict in your work?
  • How might looking at art through a queer theory lens, or queer formalist lens (not dealing with sex/gender, but looking outside of binary systems) impact your work?
  • Why have there been no great women artists (tongue in cheek)? What factors have kept them from the canon, and what do we do about that?
  • What is of eternal consequence here, and what is cultural and temporal? Support your arguments. (Only answer this if you didn’t answer it for the previous set of readings).

6.2: Gender as a Cultural Lens, part 1

How Ideas of Gender Shape Culture
Read by Sat Feb 13,
Reading Response due Wed Feb 17,
Guerrilla Girls, Do Women Have To Be Naked To Get Into the Met. Museum?, 1989
Guerrilla Girls (1985–)
Do Women Have To Be Naked To Get Into the Met. Museum?, 1989

Why?

Gender and sex have long been factors when editing culture. For centuries women were barred from markets, educational opportunities, voting, owning land, jobs, histories, voices, and more. Although strides have been made in recent decades, we are far from parity. It is important to look closer at not only the history of discrimination, but to dissect definitions of sex and gender to better understand other forms of discrimination and cultural editing.

Two main voices that you’ll see below belong to Simone de Beauvoir (1909–1986) and Judith Butler (1956–). De Beauvoir’s book The Second Sex (1949) helped spur the feminist movements of the 1950s forward. It outlined how the idea of woman is constructed socially, and that one becomes a woman through performing the roles, actions, and aesthetics that society dictates. Judith Butler built off of de Beauvoir’s ideas with her book Gender Trouble (1990) which posited that not only gender was socially contructed, but sex as well. Butler’s writings are foundational to queer theory and intersectionality.

Understandably, this can be a tricky topic considering how we see and address sex and gender in the Church. These readings are to help you understand world views of these topics. It is up to you to discern between what is of eternal consequence and what is temporal and cultural. It is also important to mention that the way the Church uses the term “gender” and the way that gender theorists use the term are very differently. Church leaders tend to use the terms “sex” and “gender” synonymously. Gender theorists differentiate between the two as you will find in your readings.

Required

Feminisms, Cultural Theory and Popular Culture
Introduction, The Second Sex

Supplementary Readings

Gender Theory
An Introduction to Judith Butler’s Gender Troubles
“Gender is ‘performative.’ It’s based on what we do. It is not part of our nature; we simply act it out. So definitions of masculinity and femininity are constructed, rather than something that comes from within us.”
Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson
“Paglia believes that ‘sexual physiology provides the pattern for our experience of the world.’ She follows Hobbes, Sade, Nietzsche, and Freud in her antifeminist view of (sexual) nature–not culture–as the ultimate determinant of human history and relationships. Society is needed to keep that potentially destructive nature in check; undefeated, however, pagan eroticism still flourishes in Western culture. This large, often aphoristic volume traces pagan, sometimes mythological, archetypes from antiquity through the 19th century. An introductory chapter expounds Paglia’s thesis that Western aesthetics has been Apollonian (sky god)–male, rational; and has repressed its Dionysian (earth god)–female, emotional polarity. Major chapters deal with Italian Renaissance art ("an explosion of sexual personae” in its rebirth of pagan forms), Spenser, Shakespeare, Rousseau, Goethe, Blake, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Byron, Shelley, Keats, Balzac, Gautier, Baudelaire, Huysmans, the Bronte sisters, Swinburne, Pater, late 19th-century decadent art, Wilde, Poe, Hawthorne, Melville, Emerson, Whitman, James, and Dickinson. Paglia’s perceptions are interdisciplinary; a large dose of psychological anthropology is mixed with her literary and cultural criticism.”
What Does ‘Hood Feminism’ Mean For A Pandemic?, Code Switch
“This week on the show, we're talking about race, feminism and COVID-19 with Mikki Kendall. She's the author of the new book Hood Feminism: Notes from the Women that a Movement Forgot, which is about all the ways in which feminists who are women of color—especially black feminists—have a wider agenda than the mainstream, largely white feminist movement.”
Key Issues in Postcolonial Feminism: A Western Perspective, Gender Forum
“Post-colonial feminists are still in the process of contesting the Eurocentric gaze that privileges Western notions of liberation and progress and portrays Third World women primarily as victims of ignorance and restrictive cultures and religions.”
How Pink Became a Color for Girls, Racked
“For most of history, pink was just another color. It was worn equally by men and women. A line in Little Women published in 1869 refers to Amy as tying pink and blue ribbons around two babies to tell the male from the female ‘in the French fashion.’ That’s often cited as a reason pink became affiliated with girls. However, ribbons aside, babies were generally dressed in white, and if you did have twins that needed to be color-coded you didn’t have to go with pink or blue ribbons. A catalogue from 1918 even recommended dressing female babies in blue as it had a ‘much more delicate and dainty tone.’”
Simone de Beauvoir
Dungeons & Dragons & Philosophers III: Ladies’ Night at the Dragon’s Den, Existential Comics
Read the comic, but also the blurbs underneath about each philosopher featured: Philippa Foot, Simone de Beauvoir, G.E.M. Anscombe, Judith Butler, and Hannah Arendt.
An Introduction to Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex
“‘One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.’ Male-dominated society deliberately constructs the idea of femininity to keep men in control.”
The Second Sex
“In 1946, Simone de Beauvoir began to outline what she thought would be an autobiographical essay explaining why, when she had tried to define herself, the first sentence that came to mind was ‘I am a woman.’ That October, my maiden aunt, Beauvoir’s contemporary, came to visit me in the hospital nursery. I was a day old, and she found a little tag on my bassinet that announced, ‘It’s a Girl!’ In the next bassinet was another newborn (‘a lot punier,’ she recalled), whose little tag announced, ‘I’m a Boy!’ There we lay, innocent of a distinction—between a female object and a male subject—that would shape our destinies. It would also shape Beauvoir’s great treatise on the subject. Beauvoir was then a thirty-eight-year-old public intellectual who had been enfranchised for only a year.”
What is Woman? (de Beauvoir + Metroid)
“Simone de Beauvoir, existentialist philosopher, feminist theorist, and author of The Second Sex, may not seem to be a good match for the 1986 Nintendo video game Metroid, but 8-Bit Philosophy, a web series that explains philosophical concepts by way of vintage video games, makes it make sense.”
Simone de Beauvoir: 1975 Interview
“In the 1975 interview with French journalist Jean-Louis Servan-Schreiber—‘Why I’m a Feminist’—De Beauvoir picks up the ideas of The Second Sex, which Servan-Schreiber calls as important an ‘ideological reference’ for feminists as Marx’s Capital is for communists. He asks De Beauvior about one of her most quoted lines: 'One is not born a woman, one becomes one.’ Her reply shows how far in advance she was of post-modern anti-essentialism, and how much of a debt later feminist thinkers owe to her ideas.” (Open Culture)
Feminisms
Feminism in the Light of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, BYU Studies Quarterly
“In its most basic basic form, feminism echoes eternal truths of the gospel, which affirms the equal worth of all people, the equal right to and capacity for spirituality, and the evils of abuse.”
It’s Not (All) the Second Wave’s Fault, Elle
“In 2010, during yet another of these intergenerational scraps, Katha Pollitt complained that the 'new wave’ talk was used ‘to describe each latest crop of feminists—loosely defined as any female with more political awareness than a Bratz doll—and to portray them in terms of their rejection of second wavers, who are supposedly starchy and censorious [. . .] The wave structure,’ she continued, ‘. . . looks historical, but actually it is used to misrepresent history by evoking ancient tropes about repressive mothers and rebellious daughters.’”
What Does ‘Hood Feminism’ Mean For A Pandemic?, Code Switch
“This week on the show, we're talking about race, feminism and COVID-19 with Mikki Kendall. She's the author of the new book Hood Feminism: Notes from the Women that a Movement Forgot, which is about all the ways in which feminists who are women of color—especially black feminists—have a wider agenda than the mainstream, largely white feminist movement.”
Key Issues in Postcolonial Feminism: A Western Perspective, Gender Forum
“Post-colonial feminists are still in the process of contesting the Eurocentric gaze that privileges Western notions of liberation and progress and portrays Third World women primarily as victims of ignorance and restrictive cultures and religions.”
Women Design: Pioneers in Architecture, Industrial, Graphic and Digital Design from the Twentieth Century to the Present Day
“From architects and product designers to textile artists and digital innovators, Women Design profiles a selection of the most dynamic female designers from the modern era, showcasing their finest work and celebrating their enduring influence. Design throughout history has been profoundly shaped and enhanced by the creativity of women; as practitioners, commentators, educators and commissioners. But in a narrative that eagerly promotes their male counterparts, their contributions are all too often overlooked. Through 21 engaging profiles, Women Design rediscovers and revels in the work of pioneers such as Eileen Gray, Lora Lamm and Lella Vignelli, while shining a spotlight on modern-day trailblazers including Kazuyo Sejima, Hella Jongerius and Neri Oxman. Richly illustrated with archival imagery, this is a rare glimpse into the working worlds of some of the most influential forces in contemporary design.”
Women Who Draw
“Women Who Draw is an open directory of female* professional illustrators, artists and cartoonists. It was created by two women artists in an effort to increase the visibility of female illustrators, emphasizing female illustrators of color, LBTQ+, and other minority groups of female illustrators. *Women Who Draw is trans-inclusive and includes women, trans and gender non-conforming illustrators.”
The Role of Women in Design | 12 Designers – 12 Opinions, Graphicart News
“What role are women designers playing in today’s world? Are they taking a more leading role in the design field? Do women and their male counterparts differ in anyway? From a feminist aspect, women and men do not differ in any kind. However, the numbers speak the truth, as we do not find enough women designers in conferences, publications, or as jurors. Is this a reversing trend? Barbara Szaniecki from Brazil, Belen Mena from Ecuador, Benito Cabanas from Mexico, Chris Lozos from United States, Gitte Kath from Denmark, Jamila Varawala from India, Lygia Santiago from Brazil, Maria Mercedes Salgado from Ecuador, Marina Córdova Alvéstegui and Susana Machicao both from Bolivia, respectable designers , well known to our community and Veerle Poupeye from Jamaica, Executive Director of the National Gallery of Jamaica, were called to give the role of women in design as they experiences it in their respective countries or just global observations. They came with very interesting points and links for your references.”
Rebecca Wright on the Ratio of Girls with Design Degrees vs. Those in the Industry, It's Nice That
“We often find ourselves discussing the role, and lack of women in the world of graphic design. Rather than try and cackhandedly work it out for ourselves we decided to ask someone at the frontline of the issue to help explain it. Rebecca Wright is programme director of graphic communication design at Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London.”
How One Design Agency is Fighting for Feminism, Creative Bloq
“Liam Fay-Fright explains why Mother London joined forces with fashion mag Elle to fight the patriarchy, in the design industry and beyond.”
How Do Tech’s Biggest Companies Compare on Diversity?, The Verge
The Verge created a set of interactive charts that break down diversity at some of the biggest tech comapnies: Apple, Google, Twitter, Intel, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon.
Haus Proud: The Women of Bauhaus, The Guardian
“More women than men applied to the school in 1919, and Gropius insisted that there would be ‘no difference between the beautiful and the strong sex’—those very words betraying his real views. Those of the 'strong sex’ were, in fact, marked out for painting, carving and, from 1927, the school’s new architecture department. The 'beautiful sex’ had to be content, mostly, with weaving.”
Invisible Women, 99% Invisible

“Even when women are the focus of design, their actual needs are still sometimes ignored. Consider the three-stone stove, a traditional cooking mechanism used by 80% of people in the developing world. It is a simple device consisting of three stones with a fire underneath and a pot above. This stove not terribly efficient and is often placed in poorly ventilated rooms, exposing women in particular to the equivalent of multiple packs of cigarettes per day worth of harmful smoke. Alternatives have been developed by well-meaning groups, but adoption has been slow, in part because many designers have simply failed to consult the actual women for whom they are designing.”

Invisible Women

“Welcome to the Gender Data Gap. Our world is largely built for and by men, in a system that can ignore half the population. This book will tell you how and why this matters In her new book, Invisible Women, award-winning campaigner and writer Caroline Criado Perez shows us how, in a world largely built for and by men, we are systematically ignoring half the population. She exposes the gender data gap - a gap in our knowledge that is at the root of perpetual, systemic discrimination against women, and that has created a pervasive but invisible bias with a profound effect on women's lives. Caroline brings together for the first time an impressive range of case studies, stories and new research from across the world that illustrate the hidden ways in which women are excluded from the very building blocks of the world we live in, and the impact this has on their health and wellbeing. From government policy and medical research, to technology, workplaces, urban planning and the media - Invisible Women exposes the biased data that excludes women. In making the case for change, this powerful and provocative book will make you see the world anew.”

What Does a Feminist Graphic Design History in the United States Look Like?, Alphabettes

“It is my hope that this digital collection can be considered a humble contribution to the ongoing feminist effort in design. There are multiple limits in this collection. There is a disturbing lack of literature on women’s impact in the history of graphic design, independently of their background.”

This is part one of a four-part series.

Response Questions

Remember to cite specific instances from the text to support your views.

  • What are the issues around discussing only a singular feminism?
  • According to Butler, the question of “the subject” of feminism is crucial for politics, and for feminist politics in particular. How and why?
  • As with any issue of an “other” or a power struggle, would it be more advantageous to force the existing structures to accept the marginalized, or for the marginalized to create their own structures that are more inclusive? Why? Can you think of examples?
  • What is of eternal consequence here, and what is cultural and temporal? Support your views.

5.2: Thinking and Writing Critically About Art and Design

Articulating Ideas About Art
Read by Sat Feb 06,
Reading Response due Wed Feb 10,
Eye and Hand

Why?

We have now spent some time understanding visual literacy and going even deeper to understand different layers of “texts” (think connotations and latent text). Most of this has been in service of better understanding the intricacies of the imagery you create. However, we can’t overlook the importance of the written word in stepping up to offer critique, and helping out when the imagery isn’t doing all of the conceptual lifting. An inarticulate designer will struggle with clients, have difficulty selling themselves, and will miss opportunities that are more obvious to keener designers. A designer who can express themselves, think critically, and competently verbalize their ideas will be head and shoulders above the pack.

Required

Why Writing Should Be Part of Your Design Portfolio, Inside Design

Read: Use your time this week to begin work on the Writing Exam. The resources below will help you find the answers you need to answer the questions. You can save, exit, and return to the exam as needed, so you can take it in stages.

NO SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS REQUIRED FOR THIS SET.
The required readings above and Writing Exam are extensive enough.

Supplementary Readings

Art/Design Criticism & Art/Design Journalism
Reflecting on the Mistakes I’ve Made as an Art Critic, Hyperallergic
“Art critic Seph Rodney considers on his reviews during the last few years and what he may have gotten wrong and why.”
Writing a Review of an Exhibition, A Short Guide to Writing About Art
“Writing a review requires analytic skill, but a review is not identical with an analysis. An analysis usually focuses on one work or at most a few, and often the work (let’s say Picasso’s Guemica) is familiar to the readers. On the other hand, a review of an exhibition normally is concerned with a fairly large number of works, many of which may be unfamiliar.” Note: I don’t agree with all of Sylvan’s views on what to include in a review, so read this with a grain of salt. There is some very useful information in here, though.
SuperScript, The Walker Art Center
Note: This site contains a number of essays and presentation videos. “In May 2015, the Walker Art Center and Mn Artists hosted Superscript: Arts Journalism and Criticism in a Digital Age, a three-day conference of panels, keynotes, and a blog mentorship program, all dedicated to pondering the present and possible futures for arts publishing online. To complement the proceedings, the Walker and MnArtists collaborated on a series of commissioned essays features thinking by some of the field’s most incisive voices on key topics not addressed within the live event, published in the months following the conference. This page documents the entirety of this inaugural experiment.”
Art Criticism in the Age of Yelp, Rhizome
“In a writing style that picks up on both the casualness and directness of reviews on Yelp, Droitcour manages to avoid many of the pitfalls of art reviewing, those traits (convoluted sentences, overly grand claims, reliance on jargon) that have led to the many essays putting art criticism to death. Could Yelp be the answer for some of the stylistic issues with criticism? It’s hard to ignore the prevailing tone in Yelp reviews. As they refer largely to experiences, they are highly subjective; every other sentence begins with ‘I,’ and they include a lot of storytelling and little information.”
Post-Internet Art Criticism Survey, Kunstkritikk
“So do we need a new generation of writers to do justice to a new range of subjects/crises? Yes, though all these new materialist, object-oriented, speculative, ecological, network ideas are spreading rapidly, they are still oddly invoked to reignite old ideas of critique, resistance, utopia and the like—invoked to save what’s lost. Not that I personally subscribe to all of these new ideas, but at least they should serve to challenge, if not debunk, the latter. The imperative of resistance, for instance, does not just hark back to ‘68, but even to World War II as pointed out by philosopher Michel Serres. So if you’re not into resistance, you’re a corrupt ‘collaborateur’.”
Art Criticism in the Networked Age, Kunstlicht
Note: This is a publication with numerous articles. “It is within this context that art criticism–which has professed itself to be in a crisis since Flusser’s time of writing at the very least–is to maintain itself. The current condition of art criticism is exemplary of these hybrid times: traditional art criticism seems like an anachronism, a relic of the enlightenment project. But at the same time, the need for art criticism is still urgent–perhaps more urgent than ever.”
Has the Internet Changed Art Criticism? On Service Criticism and A Possible Future, Rhizome
“Look at the title. I’m asking has, not 'how.’ Contemporary art is still in the early stages of the digital shift that other industries have already experienced. To better understand what might be happening to art criticism, we should look to other fields and assess the structures that have developed as a response to the internet’s effect.”
Hyperallergic, at Age 9, Rivals the Arts Journalism of Legacy Media, Nieman Reports
“More than a million people read Hyperallergic each month, says Gueyikian, who is publisher. The site’s revenue last year was $1.5 million, an increase from about $1.1 million in 2016, he says. The couple have invested personal savings into the business and have yet to pay themselves full salaries. Their first profitable year was 2014, and they have been primarily funded by ads since, breaking about even each year, Gueyikian says 'Essentially, they are one of the few, if not the only, commercially viable, native-to-online publishing institutions to emerge in the last decade,’ says Sky Goodden, editor and publisher of Momus, an online publication that emphasizes art criticism.”
ARTS.BLACK: An Editorial Note, Temporary Art Review
“Though we are in the age of ‘democratized media’, its facilitators and content are hardly reflective of the artists, and the individuals who consume it. The lack of Black writers in the critical arts realm influences an industry that is completely one dimensional.”
Structuralist/Post-Structuralist/New Criticism
The Intentional Fallacy, The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry
“The claim of the author’s 'intention’ upon the critic’s judgment has been challenged in a number of recent discussions, notably in the debate entitled The Personal Heresy, between Professors Lewis and Tillyard. But it seems doubtful if this claim and most of its romantic corollaries are as yet subject to any widespread questioning. The present writers, in a short article entitled ‘Intention’ for a Dictionary1 of literary criticism, raised the issue but were unable to pursue its implications at any length. We argued that the design or intention of the author is neither available nor desirable as a standard for judging the success of a work of literary art, and it seems to us that this is a principle which goes deep into some differences in the history of critical attitudes. It is a principle which accepted or rejected points to the polar opposites of classical 'imitation’ and romantic expression. It entails many specific truths about inspiration, authenticity, biography, literary history and scholarship, and about some trends of contemporary poetry, especially its allusiveness. There is hardly a problem of literary criticism in which the critic’s approach will not be qualified by his view of ‘intention.’”
Criticism and Truth
“Written in 1966 in response to an attack on Barthes’s Sur Racine, this polemic answers many of the charges brought against French New Criticism by conservative, academic, 19th-century-oriented critics: lack of ‘objectivity,’ fondness for ‘jargon,’ indifference to the author’s intention, etc. More positively, Barthes outlines some key concerns: plurality of meanings; analysis, based on linguistics, of the structures of possible meanings; the idea of a science of literature; and the dynamics of reading. Though some of the issues are specific to the French literary-academic situation, the bulk of this brief essay is a lively and accessible statement of an important modern critical position that is worth reading.“
The Death of the Author
"This conception perfectly suits criticism, which can then take as its major task the discovery of the Author (or his hypostases: society, history, the psyche, freedom) beneath the work: once the Author is discovered, the text is ‘explained:’ the critic has conquered; hence it is scarcely surprising not only that, historically, the reign of the Author should also have been that of the Critic, but that criticism (even “new criticism”) should be overthrown along with the Author.”
The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts

“In this erudite and imaginative book, Umberto Eco sets forth a dialectic between ‘open’ and ‘closed’ texts.”

Writing About Your Own Work
No Longer Interested, A Blade of Grass
“I’ve worked to strike the phrase ‘I am interested in’ from my vocabulary. It is not easy. For years I have heard fellow artists explain their practice beginning with: ‘I am interested in notions of…’ ‘I am interested in the intersection between…’ ‘I am interested in questioning…’ I searched for the phrase ‘I am interested in’ in connection to ‘artist statement’ and was embarrassed at how far reaching this crutch phrase is among my peers.” You can follow up this reading with any of the other 15 essays from the same series, linked to at the bottom of Steve’s essay.
Writing an Artist Statement? First Ask Yourself These Four Questions, The Guardian
“Academia is only one part of the art world, says Daniel Blight. To reach wider audiences, let’s find an alternative to artspeak.”
“Don’t Quote Deleuze”: How to Write a Good Artist Statement, Artspace
“Writing about art is hard. Writing about art that you made can be even harder. We hear artists say, ‘If I knew how to describe my work in words, I’d be a writer, not an artist.’ While this may be true, what’s ‘truer’ is the fact that at some point, you as an artist will be asked to write an artist statement—and whether or not it is good, will matter. So, what makes an artist statement ‘good’? Whether you’re applying for a residency or grant, or you just want to perfect your elevator pitch, here are a handful of things not to include in your artist statement, plus a few tips to make the process a little less excruciating.”
The Anti-artist-statement Statement
“I hate artist statements. Really, I do. As an artist, they are almost always awkward and painful to write, and as a viewer they are similarly painful and uninformative to read. I also don’t know who decided that artists should be responsible for writing their own ‘artist statement.’ Maybe it was an understaffed gallery in the 1980s, or a control freak think-inside-my-box-or-get-out MFA program director, but regardless of how this standardized practice came to be, the artist’s statement as professional prerequisite (at least for artists who have yet to be validated by the established art world) has long overstayed its welcome. And I don’t think a new one should be required in its place.”
In Defense of the Artist Statement, Hyperallergic
“As a writer who works with visual artists, I was inspired to address Iris Jaffe’s recent post, ‘The Anti-artist-statement Statement.’ [. . .] Don’t get me wrong: I don’t need an artist’s manifesto or moral judgments or childhood stories. And I definitely don’t want to waste time reading clichés, artspeak, or cool-sounding phrases spit out by an arty robot. Someone else, like the gallery, can be responsible for informing me about historical or cultural context. All I want from an artist statement is a link between the work and the artist. When this is done honestly, the result is original and authentic. It’s simple, but there is so much resistance that the simplicity is overlooked.”

Response Questions

There is no reading response required for this set since you will be working on the Writing Exam.

2.2: Truth in the modern age and beyond, part 1

Oh, Say, What is Truth?
Read by Sat Jan 16,
Reading Response due Wed Jan 20,
Sara Finelli ,Pinokkio (Pinocchio), 2003
Sara Finelli
Pinokkio (Pinocchio), 2003

Why?

President Kimball stated: “There are relative truths, and there are also absolute truths which are the same yesterday, today, and forever—never changing. These absolute truths are not altered by the opinions of men. As science has expanded our understanding of the physical world, certain accepted ideas of science have had to be abandoned in the interest of truth.” The ideas we discuss in class are our best attempts at understanding our world and how we can operate in it. But some of these ideas may prove to be less useful or productive in the future. That is the nature of the game.d

So far in class, we have discussed a number of theories—abstracted, conceptual bases of our fields. At times we have even considered examples and illustrations of these theories as they are put into practice, or seen in the wild. Some may even seem very compelling and logical. These are important ideas to know and understand, but truth is only discovered through the Spirit, not philosophical machinations. Our ultimate goal should be obtaining and understanding absolute truths. This does not mean that all relative truths are useless and should not be considered, but some are more useful than others for our time on earth. The readings below range from the religious to the philosophical, to understand how the world has looked at truth, facts, honesty, and reality.

There is some terminology that may come up that will be important to understand:

  • Ontology: “As a first approximation, ontology is the study of what there is. Some contest this formulation of what ontology is, so it’s only a first approximation. Many classical philosophical problems are problems in ontology: the question whether or not there is a god, or the problem of the existence of universals, etc.. These are all problems in ontology in the sense that they deal with whether or not a certain thing, or more broadly entity, exists.”1 In short, ontology is concerned with truth as an abstract.
  • Epistemology: “Plato’s epistemology was an attempt to understand what it was to know, and how knowledge (unlike mere true opinion) is good for the knower. Locke’s epistemology was an attempt to understand the operations of human understanding, Kant’s epistemology was an attempt to understand the conditions of the possibility of human understanding, and Russell’s epistemology was an attempt to understand how modern science could be justified by appeal to sensory experience.”2 In short, epistemology is concerned in how humans come to know or understand truth.

Required

What is Truth?, The Great Courses
Absolute Truth, ChurchofJesusChrist.org

Supplementary Readings

Truth and Knowledge (Philosophy)
What is Philosophy?: Crash Course Philosophy #1, PBS Digital Studios
“Today Hank begins to teach you about Philosophy by discussing the historical origins of philosophy in ancient Greece, and its three main divisions: metaphysics, epistemology, and value theory. He will also introduce logic, and how you’re going to use it to understand and critically evaluate a whole host of different worldviews throughout this course. And also, hopefully, the rest of your life.”
Cartesian Skepticism – Neo, Meet Rene: Crash Course Philosophy #5, PBS Digital Studios
“This week Hank introduces skepticism, exploring everything from the nature of reality through the eyes of a 17th century philosopher and, of course, The Matrix.”
Locke, Berkeley, & Empiricism: Crash Course Philosophy #6, PBS Digital Studios
“This week we answer skeptics like Descartes with empiricism. Hank explains John Locke’s primary and secondary qualities and why George Berkeley doesn’t think that distinction works – leaving us with literally nothing but our minds, ideas, and perceptions.”
The Meaning of Knowledge: Crash Course Philosophy #7, PBS Digital Studios
“On today’s episode… CATS. Also: Hank talks about some philosophy stuff, like a few of the key concepts philosophers use when discussing belief and knowledge, such as what defines an assertion and a proposition, and that belief is a kind of propositional attitude. Hank also discusses forms of justification and the traditional definition of knowledge, which Edmund Gettier just totally messed with, using his Gettier cases.”
PHILOSOPHY – Kant: On Metaphysical Knowledge, Wireless Philosophy
“Kant famously claims that we have synthetic apriori knowledge. Indeed, this claim is absolutely central to all of his philosophy. But what is synthetic apriori knowledge? Scott Edgar helpfully breaks-down this category of knowledge by first walking through Kant’s distinction between empirical and apriori knowledge and then his distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments. The interaction between these distinctions is then illustrated with numerous examples, making it clear why Kant, unlike Hume, thought that there is knowledge that is both apriori and synthetic and that this is the type of knowledge philosophers seek.”
PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Introduction to Theory of Knowledge, Wireless Philosophy
“In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) launches our Theory of Knowledge series. We look at the line between knowing and just believing something, focusing on factors like truth and confidence.”
PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #1 (The Gettier Problem), Wireless Philosophy
“Is knowledge the same as justified true belief? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) discusses a Gettier case, a scenario in which someone has justified true belief but not knowledge. We’ll look at a Gettier case from Edmund Gettier’s famous 1963 paper on this topic, and a structurally similar case from 8th century Classical Indian philosophy.”
PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #2 (No-False-Lemma and No-Defeater Approaches), Wireless Philosophy
“If we can’t analyze knowledge simply as justified true belief, can we add one more ingredient to produce a successful analysis? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel examines two ‘extra ingredient’ analyses of knowledge: Michael Clark’s ‘no false lemma’ analysis, and the fancier ‘no undefeated defeaters’ analysis of Keith Lehrer and Thomas Paxson.”
PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #3 (Causal and Reliabilist Theories), Wireless Philosophy
“Is knowledge a matter of being causally connected to the world in the right way? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) examines the causal theory of knowledge proposed by Alvin Goldman in 1967, and then discusses the problems with the causal theory that led Goldman to formulate his influential reliabilist theory of knowledge.”
PHILOSOPHY – Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #4 (Tracking Theories), Wireless Philosophy
“Problems for the causal theory of knowledge led epistemologists to propose that knowledge is a matter of tracking the truth. Fred Dretske and Robert Nozick developed this idea using counterfactual conditions. In this Wireless Philosophy video, Geoff Pynn (Northern Illinois University) examines the tracking idea, consider how it improves on the causal theory, and then discuss some well known objections to the theories advanced by Dretske and Nozick.”
Art and Epistemology, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

“The relationship between art and epistemology has been forever tenuous and fraught with much debate. It seems fairly obvious that we gain something meaningful from experiences and interactions with works of art. It does not seem so obvious whether or not the experiences we have with art can produce propositional knowledge that is constituted by true justified belief. In what follows I will give some historical background on the debate and flesh out some of the important issues surrounding the question ‘(What) can we learn from art?’”

The Cave : A Parable Told by Orson Welles

An animated version of Plato's allegory of the cave. “In the allegory, Socrates describes a group of people who have lived chained to the wall of a cave all their lives, facing a blank wall. The people watch shadows projected on the wall from objects passing in front of a fire behind them and give names to these shadows. The shadows are the prisoners' reality but are not accurate representations of the real world. Three higher levels exist: the natural sciences; mathematics, geometry, and deductive logic; and the theory of forms. Socrates explains how the philosopher is like a prisoner who is freed from the cave and comes to understand that the shadows on the wall are not reality at all. A philosopher aims to understand and perceive the higher levels of reality. However, the other inmates of the cave do not even desire to leave their prison, for they know no better life.”1

  1. “Allegory of the Cave,” Wikipedia, accessed February 4, 2021, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Allegory_of_the_cave
Truth and Knowledge in the Gospel
Absolute Truth, Churchofjesuschrist.org
“This true way of life is not a matter of opinion. There are absolute truths and relative truths. The rules of dietetics have changed many times in my lifetime. Many scientific findings have changed from year to year. The scientists taught for decades that the world was once a nebulous, molten mass cast off from the sun, and later many scientists said it once was a whirl of dust which solidified. There are many ideas advanced to the world that have been changed to meet the needs of the truth as it has been discovered. There are relative truths, and there are also absolute truths which are the same yesterday, today, and forever—never changing.”
The Truth of All Things, Churchofjesuschrist.org
“Mom put the responsibility of developing faith and finding answers on me. She knew that the important answers would come from my seeking truth the way that Heavenly Father has prescribed. She knew that I needed to find the truth. She knew that I needed to be sincere in my questions and be willing to act on what I already knew to be true. She knew that I needed to study and pray and that I needed to develop greater patience as I sought answers from the Lord. Willingness to be patient is part of our search for truth and part of the Lord’s pattern of revealing truth.”
He Hath Filled the Hungry with Good Things, Churchofjesuschrist.org
“As the world slouches toward the 21st century, many long for something, sometimes cry out for something, but too often scarcely know for what. The economic condition in the world, speaking generally and certainly not specifically, is probably better than it has ever been in history, but the human heart is still anxious and often filled with great stress. We live in an “information age” that has a world of data available literally at our fingertips, yet the meaning of that information and the satisfaction of using knowledge in some moral context seems farther away for many than ever before.”
What is Truth?, Churchofjesuschrist.org
“Part of the reason for poor judgment comes from the tendency of mankind to blur the line between belief and truth. We too often confuse belief with truth, thinking that because something makes sense or is convenient, it must be true. Conversely, we sometimes don’t believe truth or reject it—because it would require us to change or admit that we were wrong. Often, truth is rejected because it doesn’t appear to be consistent with previous experiences. When the opinions or ‘truths’ of others contradict our own, instead of considering the possibility that there could be information that might be helpful and augment or complement what we know, we often jump to conclusions or make assumptions that the other person is misinformed, mentally challenged, or even intentionally trying to deceive. Unfortunately, this tendency can spread to all areas of our lives—from sports to family relationships and from religion to politics.”
On Being Genuine, ChurchofJesusChrist.org
“Although modern historians have questioned the truthfulness of this story, the term ‘Potemkin village’ has entered the world’s vocabulary. It now refers to any attempt to make others believe we are better than we really are.”
Honesty
And Nothing but the Truth, This American Life
“Reporter Nazanin Rafsanjani brings us the story of Brad Blanton, a psychologist who founded a philosophy called "Radical Honesty.” Brad believes that the way to be happy is to tell the truth all the time. This philosophy helped him help a lot of people as a therapist. But it got in the way a little when, in 2006, he left his practice, ran for a seat in the US Congress, and became that rarest of things: a political candidate who never lies.”
Why Be Honest?, Psychology Today
"We all lie. Admittedly, most of do so only occasionally. But we still all do. Yet most of us also consider ourselves honest. In his book, The (Honest) Truth about Dishonesty, Dan Ariely offers evidence that we’re able to believe we’re honest even though we lie or cheat by doing so only in little ways. We’re therefore able to tell ourselves we’re mostly honest—that is, we’re only dishonest in ways that we think don’t matter. Apparently this strategy works: most of us don’t suffer serious cognitive dissonance over our integrity.”
How Honesty Could Make You Happier, The New York Times
“I’ve been keeping an honesty journal for the past several months. With honesty much in the news lately — you might even say honesty is having a cultural moment — I wanted to reflect on my own. My 6-year-old daughter once told me that telling the truth made her feel “gold in her brain.” Could upping my personal honesty light up a pleasure center in my own brain?”

Response Questions

Remember to cite specific instances from the text to support your views.

  • Compare an LDS view of truth with some of the philosophical views of truth. Where do they overlap and where do they differ?
  • Based on your readings, how might you define “truth?” How might that definition shape your life and your work in your field?
  • What might be the cases for dishonesty, or is it always wrong in every situation?
  • Do you consider your field to be an inherently truthful or dishonest field? Why or why not?
  1. “Logic and Ontology,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, October 11, 2017, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ontology/#Ont.
  2. “Epistemology,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, April 11, 2020, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/.